The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) lacks authority to require broadband providers to give equal treatment to all internet traffic that flows over their servers. The FCC’s job is to regulate telecommunications, and in the law suit, Comcast Corp. challenged the FCC’s right to regulate Network Neutrality obligations on all the different broadband providers.
The unanimous decision by the court will have large implications on the FCC’s ability to regulate broadband providers and will undermine what they will and will not be able to demand of these providers. The suit will also have huge implications on the National Broadband plan that the FCC had been planning; the FCC was planning on spreading broadband throughout the nation by tapping into federal funds, but this case may undermine such efforts.
The FCC argues that braodband providers are currently able to discriminate against certain websites and services but that complete Net Neutrality as proposed by the FCC would create a fair and legal ground for all web based services. However, I strongly believe that the government departments, such as the FCC, have no right to step into the private affairs of businesses such as Comcast and demand that they reform their practices. Therefore, I agree with the ruling of the court for upholding the democratic values of this nation and not allowing the government to expand beyond its boundaries, regardless of any negative implications it may have.









![web203011[1]](http://boohersblog.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/web2030111.jpg?w=211&h=300)
